As we continue to read Millennium
Hall I keep noticing two things, the first of which is the fact
that dystopian situations inextricably lead the women in the story to crave
utopia. Miss Melvyn /Mrs. Morgan's situation becomes utterly dystopian from the
moment that she is obliged by her age to return to the residence of her father
and step-mother. Lady Melvyn is so
totally the stereotypical wicked that it is no surprise when she digs deeper
and deeper into her seemingly endless store of malicious plots in order to make
life miserable for her step-daughter. From
the moment that Miss Melvyn's step-mother sets out to remove any competition
for her father's attention, the situation rapidly grows darker, until the young
woman finds herself in lost in what can only be called a dystopian setting. The home where her unloved and unwanted
husband, Mr. Morgan, resides is described by the author as being old and filled
with old furnishings. It was dreary, and
even the roads and the very soil were bad.
The house and its environs are like a scene from a bad dream, nothing
good grows there, nothing is pretty, nothing pleases the eye, it is a dystopian
environment. When the author then goes
on to describe the character of the sister-in-law, whose nature is petty and
mean spirited, and then concludes the portrayal of Mrs. Morgan's husband with
his selfishness and greed, truly there is no doubt that this is dystopia.
Miss Mancel's situation had a much smaller share of turmoil,
yet the younger woman certainly endured her own bleak period of emotional
dystopia when her love for Sir Edward became first an impossible situation in
spite of his sharing her feelings, to the tragedy of his death at the moment
when it looked as if they were going to be able to be wed after all.
Even though we haven't yet read the story of Lady Mary
Jones, because of the way that Mrs. Morgan, and to a lesser extent Miss Mancel
have been portrayed, it seems quite likely that Lady Mary's story will likewise
contain some dystopian elements and situations. This brings me to my second
point.
Although the stories of the first two ladies are
circumstantially different in a great many ways, the fact that they, along with
what appears to be the greater part of the Millennium Hall population, are refugees
from tragic situations that all have some degree of dystopian themes makes the
plot of the novel feel rather predictable to this point. Apparently thus far,
Scott's formula is to put a young woman into a situation where she is bound to
suffer some extremely emotional and perhaps even physical distress that she
seemingly cannot avoid. Then leave her
there for a length of time that taxes her to near destruction. Finally, just as she is on the verge of utter
ruin grant the young woman freedom through the death of the person who holds
them captive in some way. Of course then
the woman, being thankful for her salvation at the hands of 'providence'
decides to join or create a utopian community to spend the rest of her life doing
good deeds in order to thank her savior for his intervention. If this turns out to be the formula for the
remainder of the novel it will be quite disappointing. Because if the back stories of the principal members
of this utopia are so predictable then the best part of the novel, according to
critics, is certainly less interesting than reviews suggested it to be, and we
are left with a cliché set of rags to riches fairy tales where the happy ending
fairyland is an idyllic, but rather boring place where women learn to become
saints.
I hope there is more to this novel than it has contained
thus far. Utopian novels may be
notorious for their shallow plots (if they have one at all), but this story has
the potential to be more than it is so far, I hope to see it turn the corner so
to speak and give us something to really think about in the end!
I agree that the novel lacks a certain feeling of plot and character development; I still find a lot in it to think about, though. I find myself asking what Scott wants her readers to make note of--what is she trying to say, for example, about the obstacles to female agency in 18th-century England? About the source(s) of these obstacles?
ReplyDeleteAlthough the plot seems to be repeated over and over again, I think this repetition of story cycles plays an important role other than driving women from a dystopia towards a utopia. I think instead, Scott is calling for reform: in women's agency, in laws that provide women agency, the necessity for women's education.
ReplyDeletePushing off of Lauryn's assertion, I do think that Scott is calling for reform, and I think that, even though it makes for a more predictable plot, the repetition of similar situations helps to drive the point home to the reader that social reform is needed. As well, the repetition of such exaggerated examples is perhaps to draw attention to the severity of need in some situations.
ReplyDelete